Question
How does Epictetus say to master desire?
A look at what Epictetus actually recommends in the Handbook: not indulging desire, but redirecting it toward what is up to you.
Updated
The short answer
Epictetus says the discipline of desire begins with sorting what is up to you, your own judgments and choices, from what is not, your body, property, and reputation. Because desiring anything outside your control guarantees disappointment, he tells beginners to suppress desire almost entirely for now and to use pursuit and avoidance only lightly, with reservation. The aim is not to want less as a trick for feeling better, but to relocate desire onto the one thing that is genuinely yours to secure.
Key points
- Epictetus classes desire, along with opinion, pursuit, and aversion, as fully up to us, unlike body, property, or reputation.
- In Handbook 2 he instructs beginners to totally suppress desire for now, since desiring anything outside our control guarantees disappointment.
- Aversion should be confined to things contrary to the natural use of our own faculties, not to sickness, death, or poverty, which are not up to us.
- The dinner party analogy in Handbook 15 asks us to take our share with moderation, not stop what passes by, and not stretch desire toward what has not yet arrived.
- The Discourses identify training desires and aversions as the most urgent of the three topics of Stoic training, since disturbance comes from failing to get what we desire or falling into what we avoid.
The longer answer
Epictetus does not offer a technique for getting what you want more reliably. He asks you to change what desire is aimed at in the first place. Desire, for him, is one of the things fully up to us, alongside aversion, opinion, and pursuit (Handbook 1). Everything else, body, property, reputation, is not up to us. So the first move in mastering desire is sorting: what am I actually reaching for, and is it mine to secure.
The popular misreading treats this as a productivity tip: want less, so you're disappointed less. That is true as far as it goes, but it understates the claim. Epictetus says that if you desire anything not in your control, you are bound to be disappointed, and if you are averse to sickness, death, or poverty, "you will be wretched" (Handbook 2). This isn't advice about managing expectations. It is a claim about where good and bad actually live. Since only your own faculty of choice is fully yours, only its use can be good or bad. Wanting health, reputation, or a particular outcome as if it were good stakes your peace on something that was never yours to control.
Given that, Epictetus gives a strikingly hard instruction for someone starting out: "for the present, totally suppress desire" (Handbook 2). Not moderate it, not aim it more carefully at first, but suppress it. Until you can desire your own good character reliably, desire aimed anywhere else will keep misfiring. In the meantime, he says, use pursuit and avoidance only lightly, with gentleness and reservation (Handbook 2). You still act, you still reach for things, but without staking your wellbeing on the result.
The dinner party image in Handbook 15 makes this concrete. When a dish comes around, take your share with moderation. If it passes you by, don't stop it. If it hasn't arrived yet, don't stretch your desire toward it, wait until it reaches you (Handbook 15). Epictetus applies this directly to children, a wife, public office, and wealth, the very things people organize their lives around getting. The point is not indifference to these things happening or not happening. It is refusing to let your wanting run ahead of what is actually yours to secure. He adds that someone who can even decline what is offered, not just wait for it, joins not only the feast of the gods but their rule, citing Diogenes and Heraclitus as examples (Handbook 15).
The Discourses give the fuller architecture behind this single-line advice. Epictetus lists three areas of training for anyone pursuing wisdom: desires and aversions, so you get what you want and avoid what you don't; impulses to act, so you act appropriately; and assent, so your judgments aren't deceived (Discourses III 2). He is explicit that the first of these is the most urgent, because disturbance, sorrow, envy, and misfortune all trace back to failing to get what you desire or falling into what you would avoid (Discourses III 2). Training desire isn't one project among several. It is upstream of most of what disturbs us.
What changes if you take this seriously is where you locate the target of your wanting. Not less wanting for its own sake, but wanting redirected onto your own judgments and choices, the one territory nothing external can invade. A concrete way to start: before the day's version of the dinner party, a promotion, a diagnosis, a delayed reply, notice whether you are stretching your desire toward it before it has arrived, and if so, wait, and let your effort remain, lightly, with reservation.
Primary passages
But, for the present, totally suppress desire: for, if you desire any of the things which are not in your own control, you must necessarily be disappointed; and of those which are, and which it would be laudable to desire, nothing is yet in your possession. ... Use only the appropriate actions of pursuit and avoidance; and even these lightly, and with gentleness and reservation.
Epictetus, Handbook 2 Read in context
The core, and hardest, instruction: for a beginner, suppress desire entirely rather than aim it well.
If, then, you confine your aversion to those objects only which are contrary to the natural use of your faculties, which you have in your own control, you will never incur anything to which you are averse. But if you are averse to sickness, or death, or poverty, you will be wretched. Remove aversion, then, from all things that are not in our control, and transfer it to things contrary to the nature of what is in our control.
Epictetus, Handbook 2 Read in context
Shows the logic behind the instruction: aversion and desire must be relocated onto what is genuinely ours.
Is it not yet come? Don't stretch your desire towards it, but wait till it reaches you.
Epictetus, Handbook 15 Read in context
The dinner party image makes the discipline concrete: don't let wanting outrun what actually arrives.
Do this with regard to children, to a wife, to public posts, to riches, and you will eventually be a worthy partner of the feasts of the gods. And if you don't even take the things which are set before you, but are able even to reject them, then you will not only be a partner at the feasts of the gods, but also of their empire.
Epictetus, Handbook 15 Read in context
Epictetus applies the discipline to exactly the things people most want: family, status, wealth.
Of these topics the chief and the most urgent is that which relates to the affects (perturbations); for an affect is produced in no other way than by a failing to obtain that which a man desires or falling into that which a man would wish to avoid.
Epictetus, Discourses III 2 Read in context
The Discourses explain why training desire comes first: it is the direct cause of disturbance.
Important distinctions
Suppressing desire versus feeling nothing
Epictetus's instruction to suppress desire for now is not a call to become emotionless. It targets desire and aversion aimed at externals, things not up to us. He still expects you to act, to pursue and avoid appropriately, only lightly and with reservation, and the Discourses are explicit that a person in training should still maintain the natural relations of son, father, or citizen rather than sit like a statue free of affect.
Wanting less versus wanting rightly
The popular reading treats this as a technique for lowering expectations so disappointment stings less. Epictetus's actual claim is stronger: only your faculty of choice is truly yours, so only its excellent use can be good or bad. Suppressing desire toward externals is a temporary stage on the way to desiring your own good character, not a permanent policy of wanting less for its own sake.
Objections and replies
Suppressing desire sounds like giving up on wanting things
Telling someone to totally suppress desire, even provisionally, can sound like a recipe for passivity or resignation about family, career, and health.
Epictetus does not ask you to stop acting. Handbook 2 still tells you to pursue and avoid, only lightly and with reservation, and Handbook 15 has you take your share when something is offered. What is suppressed is staking your wellbeing on the outcome, not the activity of reaching for things.
This looks unlivable for ordinary attachments like family
Applying the dinner party rule to a wife or children, not stretching desire toward them, not stopping them if they pass by, sounds cold when applied to people we love.
Epictetus names exactly these cases in Handbook 15, and the Discourses insist a person in training still keeps the natural relations of son, father, and citizen rather than living free of affect like a statue. The discipline governs where your good is located, not whether you love or care for people.
Practice this in Stoa
Guided courses in the Stoa app that put this into daily practice.
Related questions
-
Can we really control our beliefs and desires?
A look at what Epictetus means when he places opinion, desire, and aversion inside our control, and what that claim does and does not promise.
-
What are the three Stoic disciplines of desire, action and assent?
A short guide to Epictetus's three fields of training and what each one asks of you.
-
What is the Stoic teaching of the two handles in Epictetus's Handbook?
A short teaching from Epictetus on choosing how to grasp what happens to you, and why that choice is up to you even when the event is not.
-
What maxims does Epictetus recommend keeping ready at hand?
A look at the three quotations Epictetus tells his students to hold close, and what they teach about accepting what is not up to us.
-
According to Epictetus, how should duties be determined between family members?
Epictetus grounds family duty in the relation itself, not in how well the other person plays their part.
-
How does Epictetus say we should respond when someone insults or wrongs us?
Epictetus argues that a person who insults you is not attacking something of yours, and that this fact should change how you respond.
-
How does Epictetus use the metaphor of an actor in a drama to describe our role in life?
A short lesson from the Handbook on why you do not choose your part, only how well you play it.
-
How should a Stoic respond to insults or mockery?
A look at what Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius actually say about being insulted, and why the insult is never the real problem.
Podcast discussions
-
Michael Trombley and Caleb on Emily Wilson's Critique of Epictetus
Michael Trombley and Caleb examine classicist Emily Wilson's three criticisms of Epictetus and test whether they hold up against the Discourses and Handbook.
-
The Stoics vs. Plato: Blank Slate or Innate Ideas
Michael Tremblay and Caleb Ontiveros compare the Stoic view of the mind as a blank slate with Plato's theory of innate knowledge, and what each means for self-knowledge.
Related concepts, philosophers and works
Sources
- Epictetus, Discourses III Primary text, Stoa library
- Epictetus, Handbook Primary text, Stoa library