Skip to content

Question

What is memento mori and how do you practice it?

Learn what the Stoics meant by keeping death in view, and how Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius, and Seneca actually practiced it.

Updated

The short answer

Memento mori, remember death, is the Stoic practice of keeping your mortality constantly in view so that you act with full seriousness right now. Epictetus recommends holding death daily before your eyes to strip away trivial fears and cravings, and Marcus Aurelius treats the possibility of dying at any moment as a standard for judging every act and thought. It is not meant to produce dread or urgency for its own sake, but clarity about what actually matters, since your character, not your lifespan, is what is up to you.

Key points

  • Epictetus tells students to keep death daily before their eyes so they never entertain an abject thought or crave anything too eagerly.
  • Marcus Aurelius uses the possibility of dying at any moment as a standard for regulating every act and thought, not as a source of dread.
  • Marcus argues that death, like life, honor, dishonor, pain, and pleasure, happens equally to good and bad people, which shows it is neither good nor evil.
  • Marcus warns against two failure modes: being violently excited and being indifferent or torpid, as well as against performing seriousness rather than having it.
  • Seneca shows a quieter version of the same awareness, noticing the evidence of his own aging in a crumbling house and trees he once planted.
  • The practice is a daily test applied to choices, asking whether this act would be one you could stand behind if it were your last.

The longer answer

Memento mori is Latin for remember death, but the Stoics did not need Latin to practice it. Epictetus tells his students to keep death, exile, and everything that looks terrible before your eyes every day, death chief among them, and says that doing so will keep you from ever entertaining an abject thought or coveting anything too eagerly (Handbook 21). The point is not to court fear. It is to use the fact of your mortality as a corrective, so that small anxieties and small greeds lose their grip.

The common misreading

People often hear memento mori as a mood: a somber reminder that life is short, meant to make you sad or make you hustle. That is not what Epictetus or Marcus are doing. Marcus Aurelius writes that since you may depart from life this very moment, you should regulate every act and thought accordingly (Meditations 2.11). That is not melancholy. It is a standard for action. If this thought, this impulse, this task might be your last, then it had better be one you can stand behind. Marcus makes the same point from the other direction in Meditations 7.69: the perfection of moral character consists in passing every day as if it were the last, and doing so without being violently excited, without going numb, and without playing the hypocrite. Notice the balance in that line. He is not asking for panic or for theatrical seriousness. He is ruling out both overexcitement and indifference, and he is ruling out performance. The daily deadline is meant to sharpen your attention, not your emotions.

Why mortality is not an evil to be dreaded

Marcus goes further than reminder. He argues for why death should not terrify you in the first place. If the gods exist, he writes, they will not involve you in evil, and if they do not exist, or do not care, then there is nothing to fear from living in a universe without providence (Meditations 2.11). But he holds that in truth they do exist and do care, and that death, like life, honor, dishonor, pain, and pleasure, happens equally to good people and bad, which means it makes no one better or worse, and so is neither good nor evil. This is the deeper Stoic claim underneath the practice: death is a natural event, not a misfortune, because your character, not your lifespan, is what is up to you. Once you accept that, watching your own mortality stops being an exercise in dread and becomes an exercise in clarity about what actually matters.

Seneca and the shock of ordinary time

Seneca gives memento mori a quieter, more domestic form. In a letter he describes visiting his old country estate and being startled to find the building crumbling and the plane trees, which he had planted himself and watched leaf out, now gnarled and bare (Moral Letters 12.1, 12.2). His bailiff blames the house and the trees themselves: they are just old. Seneca catches himself blaming the bailiff instead of admitting the plain fact, that he himself has aged along with everything he built. The passage is not about death directly, it is about the evidence of time passing that we manage not to see until it is put in front of us. That is memento mori in its least dramatic form: noticing what your own surroundings are already telling you about your years.

How to actually practice it

The Stoic version of this practice is not a mantra you repeat to feel something. It is a daily test you apply to your choices. Before you act, ask whether this is a thought or a deed you would be willing to have stand as your last, not because you expect to die today, but because that standard exposes which of your worries are trivial. Epictetus's version pairs death with exile and every other feared thing precisely so you stop overvaluing comfort and reputation, the externals not up to you, and start valuing your own judgments and choices, which are.

One concrete way to start: at the close of the day, look at one decision you made and ask whether it would embarrass you if it were your last. Not whether it succeeded. Whether it was made by someone paying full attention.

Primary passages

Let death and exile, and all other things which appear terrible be daily before your eyes, but chiefly death, and you win never entertain any abject thought, nor too eagerly covet anything.

Epictetus, Handbook 21 Read in context

Epictetus states the practice directly: keep death in view daily as a corrective against fear and craving.

Since it is possible that you may depart from life this very moment, regulate every act and thought accordingly.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.11 Read in context

Marcus turns mortality into a standard for present action, not a mood.

The perfection of moral character consists in this, in passing every day as the last, and in being neither violently excited nor torpid nor playing the hypocrite.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 7.69 Read in context

Marcus rules out both panic and indifference: the practice sharpens attention, it does not inflame emotion.

But death certainly, and life, honour and dishonour, pain and pleasure, all these things equally happen to good men and bad, being things which make us neither better nor worse. Therefore they are neither good nor evil.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.11 Read in context

The deeper argument behind the practice: death is not an evil, since it cannot touch your character.

I visited lately my country-place, and protested against the money which was spent on the tumble-down building. ... And this was the house which grew under my own hands! What has the future in store for me, if stones of my own age are already crumbling?

Seneca, Moral Letters Vol I 12.1 Read in context

Seneca's quieter version: noticing time's passage in ordinary, unglamorous evidence rather than in grand meditation.

Important distinctions

A daily standard, not a mood of sadness

Memento mori is often taken as an invitation to melancholy, a reminder that life is short meant to make you feel wistful or urgent. In Marcus Aurelius, it is instead a standard applied to action: regulate every act and thought as if you might depart from life this very moment. The aim is clear judgment about what is worth doing, not a feeling.

Fearing death versus judging it correctly

Practicing memento mori is not the same as fearing death more. Marcus argues explicitly that death makes a person neither better nor worse, and so is neither good nor evil. The practice works because death is properly judged as indifferent, not because it is dreaded. Dread would defeat the purpose.

Objections and replies

Isn't dwelling on death morbid or paralyzing

A reasonable worry is that constantly picturing your own death would make you anxious or unable to function, the opposite of the clarity the Stoics promise.

Reply

Marcus addresses this directly: the aim is to be neither violently excited nor torpid, and not to play the hypocrite about it either. The practice is meant to be steady and ordinary, closer to Seneca noticing his aging trees than to a dramatic confrontation with mortality.

Does this only work if you accept Stoic providence

Marcus's argument that death is not an evil leans partly on a claim about the gods caring for human affairs. A reader who does not accept Stoic physics might wonder if the whole practice collapses without it.

Reply

Marcus actually offers both cases: if the gods exist and care, you have nothing to fear, and if they do not exist or do not care, then there is nothing lost in a universe without providence either way. The practical upshot, that death cannot touch your character, does not depend on settling the metaphysical question first.

Practice this in Stoa

Guided courses in the Stoa app that put this into daily practice.

Related questions

Podcast discussions

Sources

  1. Epictetus, Handbook Primary text, Stoa library
  2. Marcus Aurelius, Meditations Primary text, Stoa library
  3. Seneca, Moral Letters Vol I Primary text, Stoa library