Skip to content

Question

What does Marcus Aurelius mean by stripping impressions bare of exalting words?

A look at Meditations 6.13, where Marcus practices seeing food, wine, and status for what they physically are, stripped of the language that inflates them.

Updated

The short answer

Marcus Aurelius means the practice of describing a thing in its plainest physical terms, stripped of the flattering titles and social prestige normally attached to it, so you can see what it actually is. In Meditations 6.13 he applies this to food, wine, and a purple robe, reducing them to a dead animal's body, grape juice, and dyed wool. The point is not to feel disgust but to catch the moment when outward show, not the thing itself, is what is moving you.

Key points

  • Marcus describes this as a technique for seeing things as they are, applied first to meat, wine, and a purple robe.
  • Exalting words are the layer of status, prestige, and social language that make a thing seem more valuable than it physically is.
  • He warns that outward show is most deceptive exactly when we feel most certain something is worth our effort.
  • The exercise is diagnostic rather than dismissive: it targets false judgments of value, not the objects themselves.
  • It connects to the wider Stoic claim that things like honor, pleasure, and pain happen to good and bad people alike and so are not themselves good or bad.

The longer answer

Marcus is describing a mental exercise, not a mood. He starts with something ordinary: a meal. Meat on the table is the impression of a dead animal's body, wine is grape juice, a purple robe is sheep's wool dyed with shellfish blood. He says these plain descriptions "reach the things themselves and penetrate them, and so we see what kind of things they are" (Meditations 6.13).

The move he then makes is to generalize this from food to everything that impresses us. Whatever seems most worth chasing or admiring, he says, we should lay bare, look at its worthlessness, and strip it of all the words by which it is exalted (Meditations 6.13). The word "exalting" is doing real work here. It names the layer of language and social status that sits on top of a thing and makes it look more valuable than it is. A purple robe is not intrinsically majestic. It is wool and dye, and the majesty is added by the words we use for emperors, senators, and rank.

The common misreading is to hear this as cynicism or asceticism, as if Marcus is telling you that wine is disgusting or that rank is a lie you should feel contempt for. That is not the target. He is not making a claim about the physical facts being ugly. He is making a claim about how easily "outward show is a wonderful perverter of the reason," and that the moment you are most convinced something is worth your effort is exactly when it is most likely to be deceiving you (Meditations 6.13). The exercise is diagnostic, not dismissive. You strip the impression down to see clearly, not to sneer.

This connects to the Stoic theory of judgment that runs through the Meditations. What disturbs us is never the bare fact but the evaluation stacked on top of it: the assent we give to an impression. A promotion, a title, a fine coat, these are preferred indifferents at most. Treating them as good in themselves is a judgment error, and Marcus's technique is a way of catching that error in real time, before it hardens into a settled belief about what matters. Seen this way, the exercise sits alongside his other reminders that things like honor, pleasure, and pain happen to good and bad people alike and so cannot themselves be good or bad (compare Meditations 2.11). What can be good or bad is only how you judge and use them.

What changes for someone who takes this seriously is not that they stop eating well or wearing decent clothes. It is that they stop being moved by the exalting words themselves, the titles, the branding, the social weight that gets attached to objects and positions. The wine is still wine. What loosens its grip is seeing that its pull came from language, not from the substance.

The concrete practice is simple to state and harder to keep doing. Take one thing you currently find impressive, a job title, an award, a luxury item, and describe it in the plainest physical or functional terms you can, the way Marcus describes the robe as dyed wool. Notice what falls away and what, if anything, still seems to matter once the exalting words are gone. That residue, not the show, is what deserves your attention.

Primary passages

When we have meat before us and such eatables we receive the impression, that this is the dead body of a fish, and this is the dead body of a bird or of a pig; and again, that this Falernian is only a little grape juice, and this purple robe some sheep's wool dyed with the blood of a shell-fish

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 6.13 Read in context

Marcus starts with the plainest possible redescription of food, drink, and fine clothing.

we ought to lay them bare and look at their worthlessness and strip them of all the words by which they are exalted.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 6.13 Read in context

The core instruction: strip the language of status and prestige from a thing to see what it actually is.

outward show is a wonderful perverter of the reason, and when you are most sure that you are employed about things worth your pains, it is then that it cheats you most.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 6.13 Read in context

The danger Marcus is guarding against: conviction of value is not evidence of value.

death certainly, and life, honour and dishonour, pain and pleasure, all these things equally happen to good men and bad, being things which make us neither better nor worse. Therefore they are neither good nor evil.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.11 Read in context

The wider Stoic view behind the exercise: externals are not themselves good or bad.

Important distinctions

Stripping bare versus contempt for the thing

Marcus is not telling you that wine is disgusting or that fine clothing is shameful. He is separating the physical fact from the language of status stacked on top of it. The exercise targets the judgment, not the object.

Outward show versus the thing itself

The robe is wool dyed with shellfish blood whether or not anyone calls it purple and majestic. Stripping the exalting words does not change the object. It changes whether you are moved by the object or by the reputation attached to it.

Objections and replies

Isn't this just a trick to make yourself want less?

A skeptic might say this exercise is a rhetorical sleight of hand: describe anything in ugly enough terms and it will seem worthless, which proves nothing about its real value.

Reply

Marcus is not choosing the ugliest possible description to bias the result. He is choosing the plainest one, the description that leaves out only the added language of status. If a thing still seems worth pursuing once that language is removed, the exercise has not destroyed it. It has only removed a source of distortion.

Does this mean externals never matter at all?

If honor, pleasure, and fine possessions are neither good nor bad, it might seem Stoicism asks you to be indifferent to everything external.

Reply

The passages call these things neither good nor evil in themselves, not irrelevant. They can still be reasonably preferred. The claim is narrower: your character does not depend on getting them, so they should not be exalted into the things that make a life good.

Practice this in Stoa

Guided courses in the Stoa app that put this into daily practice.

Related questions

Podcast discussions

Concepts

  • Impressions (phantasiai) You will learn why the Stoics thought the real battle happens before you react, in the instant something first strikes your mind.
  • Assent (synkatathesis) Assent is the mind's power to say yes or no to an impression, and the Stoics treat training it as the whole work of philosophy.

Works

  • Meditations by Marcus Aurelius A Roman emperor's private notebook of Stoic exercises shows what it looks like to practice philosophy under real pressure, not just write about it.

Sources

  1. Marcus Aurelius, Meditations Primary text, Stoa library