Skip to content

Question

What do the Stoics say about ambition and career success?

A look at what Epictetus says career success actually costs, and why the Stoics treat it as a preferred indifferent rather than a good.

Updated

The short answer

The Stoics do not tell you to abandon ambition. Epictetus treats career success, promotions, and social standing as preferred indifferents: things you may pursue, but which are not themselves good, since they depend on others and not on you. What matters is whether you keep your honor and integrity while pursuing them, and whether you accept that such success has a real price, paid in flattery and attendance, rather than resenting others who paid it when you did not.

Key points

  • Epictetus treats status, promotions, and invitations as things outside your control, so missing them is not a genuine dishonor.
  • He does not oppose ambition itself, only ambition pursued at the cost of one's own honor, fidelity, or integrity.
  • Success in career terms has a real price, paid in praise and attendance, and Epictetus compares it to paying for lettuce at the market.
  • People who refuse to pay that price have no grounds to resent those who did and got the reward.
  • Seneca notes that general Stoic advice can be written for anyone, but exactly when and how to act on it depends on one's actual situation.

The longer answer

Epictetus does not tell you to give up your career or stop wanting to advance in it. He tells you to see clearly what advancement actually costs, and to stop pretending you can have it without paying that cost.

In the Handbook, he imagines a student worried about missing out: I will live in dishonor, and be nobody anywhere (Handbook 24). Epictetus's answer is blunt. Dishonor of this kind is not up to you, so it cannot be an evil for you. What is up to you is your own faculty of choice, your judgments and actions. You ought to be somebody, he says, "in those things only which are in your own control, in which you may be of the greatest consequence" (Handbook 24). A promotion you did not get, an invitation you were not sent, a friend who has more pull than you do: none of these touch your character unless you decide they do.

This is where people misread Stoicism as career indifference or quietism, as if the philosophy tells you to stop trying. It does not. Epictetus is explicit that you can pursue external things, so long as you do not sacrifice your own integrity to get them: "If I can get them with the preservation of my own honor and fidelity and greatness of mind, show me the way and I will get them" (Handbook 24). The line he draws is not between ambition and passivity. It is between goods that are truly yours, meaning your judgments and choices, and goods that depend on other people and circumstances, meaning promotions, invitations, reputation, and rank.

Handbook 25 pushes this further with an analogy that is easy to miss the first time through. Suppose someone is invited to an entertainment or consulted before you are. If these things are genuinely good, be glad for him. If they are not, do not grieve that you missed them. Then Epictetus gets concrete: you cannot expect an equal share of things outside your control without paying the same price others pay for them, which is attendance, flattery, constant presence at a great man's door (Handbook 25). He compares it to buying lettuce. Someone who pays fifty cents gets the lettuce. You, who kept your fifty cents, have not been cheated. You have the money instead of the vegetable. "So, in the present case, you have not been invited to such a person's entertainment, because you have not paid him the price for which a supper is sold. It is sold for praise; it is sold for attendance" (Handbook 25). Career success, on this picture, is a transaction like any other. You can buy in. But you do not get to complain that you were denied something you refused to pay for.

Notice what Epictetus does not say. He does not say ambition is beneath you, or that a person who plays the political game is doing something shameful. He says the game has a price, and the price is real. Some people pay it gladly and get what they wanted. Others pay it and later regret the bargain. Others refuse to pay it and should stop resenting that refusal.

What changes for someone who takes this seriously is not effort but expectation. You can still work for the promotion, prepare well, put yourself forward. What you drop is the assumption that missing it is a wound to who you are, and the resentment that follows when someone less capable gets it by paying the social price you were unwilling to pay. Success and status become preferred indifferents: worth pursuing when the cost does not touch your honor or fidelity, worth walking away from when it does.

Seneca adds a caution about timing rather than value. General advice about withdrawing from showy and depraved pursuits can be written down for anyone, but exactly when and how to act on it in your own situation is something no letter can settle for you (Moral Letters 22.1 to 22.2). The principle travels. The application is yours to work out on the ground, case by case.

A concrete test before you take the next step up: ask what you would have to trade in praise, attendance, or flattery to get it, and whether you are willing to pay that price honestly, rather than pretending the price does not exist.

Primary passages

you ought to be somebody in those things only which are in your own control, in which you may be of the greatest consequence?

Epictetus, Handbook 24 Read in context

Epictetus relocates status from external rank to the faculty of choice.

If I can get them with the preservation of my own honor and fidelity and greatness of mind, show me the way and I will get them

Epictetus, Handbook 24 Read in context

Ambition itself is not condemned, only ambition that costs your integrity.

you have not been invited to such a person's entertainment, because you have not paid him the price for which a supper is sold. It is sold for praise; it is sold for attendance.

Epictetus, Handbook 25 Read in context

Success has a price paid in flattery and attendance, and Epictetus insists you see the transaction plainly.

We can formulate general rules and commit them to writing, as to what is usually done, or ought to be done ... In regard, however, to that second question,—when or how your plan is to be carried out,—no one will advise at long range

Seneca, Moral Letters Vol I 22.2 Read in context

Seneca reminds the reader that timing and application still require judgment in the actual situation.

Important distinctions

Preferred indifferent versus good

Career success, rank, and reputation are preferred indifferents for the Stoics: things generally worth choosing over their opposites, but not goods in the strict sense. Only virtue, expressed through honor, fidelity, and greatness of mind, is good. Confusing the two makes a lost promotion feel like a moral injury rather than the loss of something merely preferable.

Pursuing success versus resenting its cost

Epictetus separates the choice to pursue status, which is fine if it does not compromise your character, from the demand to receive status without paying its price in flattery or attendance. The first is a live option. The second is what he calls unjust and insatiable.

Objections and replies

This looks like an excuse for giving up on ambition

Someone might read Epictetus as counseling withdrawal from competitive life altogether, using indifference to status as cover for not trying.

Reply

Epictetus says the opposite: pursue these things if you can get them while keeping your honor and fidelity intact. The doctrine is not against effort. It is against pretending you can have the rewards of the game without paying its price, or resenting the people who did pay it.

Calling status a mere transaction feels cynical

Reducing promotions and invitations to a price paid in praise and attendance can sound like it strips ambition of any nobler motive, as if all career advancement were just flattery.

Reply

Epictetus is describing one common route to advancement, the kind secured through courting a patron's favor, not every path to achievement. His point is narrower than it first sounds: wherever success does run through flattery and attendance, see that clearly instead of resenting the honest price of admission.

Practice this in Stoa

Guided courses in the Stoa app that put this into daily practice.

Related questions

Podcast discussions

Sources

  1. Epictetus, Handbook Primary text, Stoa library
  2. Seneca, Moral Letters Vol I Primary text, Stoa library